Giotto and the Arena Chapel

Giotto and the Arena Chapel, Day 3 of the journey through nativity art.

Welcome to day 3.

Article on Giotto's nativity painting in the arena chapelAnd so it was, that, while they were there, the days were accomplished that she should be delivered. 

Luke 2:6

In a Northeast corner of Italy is the city of Padua. Even in 1303, Padua was a cosmopolitan center boasting a prestigious University. One of the residents was a man named Enrico Scrovegni, a successful banker, and by successful I mean he practiced usury (charging criminally high interest rates) and had accumulated a great deal of wealth.  Due to the usury, the Scrovegni family was notorious, so notorious that when Dante was writing his Divine Comedy he reserved a special place in the 7th circle of hell for Reginaldo Scrovegni, Enrico’s father.

Enrico, in a bid to improve his family’s reputation and perhaps save their immortal souls, built a church. The church was located next to the family palace which was built over an ancient Roman arena, thus the Scrovegni Chapel is commonly referred to as the Arena Chapel. By building, decorating, and staffing the church Enrico hoped to redeem a bit of his families honor, and earn God’s approval. He even had himself painted into the Last Judgement, presenting the Chapel to the Virgin Mary.

Giotto, Detail from The Last Judgement. Scrovegni Chapel, Padua, Italy. Enrico Scrovegni presenting the chapel to the three Mary’s.

Giotto de Bondonne, an artist from Florence had earned a name for himself and was commissioned to decorate the interior of the Chapel with fresco paintings. Giorgio Vasari, in his The Lives of the Artists, published in 1550, recounts a bit about Giotto. While some doubt the truth of all of the stories, I’ll recount a few here.

It’s said that Giotto was a cheerful, intelligent child who was tending sheep when the great Florentine painter, Cimabue, saw him drawing pictures of sheep. He was so impressed he took him on as an apprentice. On one occasion Cimabue had left the workshop and Giotto painted a fly onto a face in a painting. Upon Cimabue’s return he tried several times to flick the fly off of the work.

Right Hand: Cimabue, Madonna Enthroned 1285-86 Left Hand: Giotto, Madonna Enthroned 1306

At the left I’ve placed a work by the master Cimabue, next to Giotto’s work of the same subject. They were completed 20 years apart. You can see the obvious impact that Cimabue had on Giotto’s style, but also how different they are. Both have angels, Mary seated on a throne, and the infant Jesus. In Cimabue’s painting it’s almost as if I expect Jesus to slide off of her lap, and for Mary to tip forward out of the throne. While there is shading, overlapping, and some foreshortening it doesn’t have the realistic depth of Giotto’s work. Giotto’s Mary sits solidly on her throne, her knees’ come forward, as do the steps of the stairs. We are not concerned that the infant isn’t held securely.

Exterior of Scrovegni Chapel, also known as the Arena Chapel. Padua, Italy

When Giotto got the commission for the Arena Chapel he must have been thrilled with the interior of the building. The outside, while tall and powerful, is very austere and seems to stand in direct contrast to the colorful beauty that awaits one upon entering. There are 6 tall windows on one wall, and that is all in terms of architectural detail. This gave the artist a wonderfully large blank canvas to fill.

The theme of the chapel, unsurprisingly, was salvation, and focuses on the life of the Virgin Mary, the life of Christ, and the Passion. On one of the end walls is the Annunciation, and on the opposite is the final judgement. As you can see in the photo, there are three bands of paintings. The highest band is the life of the Virgin Mary, the central band is the life of Christ, and the lowest band is the Passion or Christ’s final week and resurrection.

Panoramic view of the interior of the Scrovegni Chapel, Arena Chapel painted by Giotto

Panoramic view of the interior of the Scrovegni Chapel, Arena Chapel painted by Giotto.

The chapel is considered one of the supreme achievements of Western art. This is not an overstatement, but universally agreed on. Giotto was a true genius, and the chapel was done at the height of his career. One entire building covered from floor to ceiling with one work after another, all by one artist, providing a unified narrative experience.

Giotto is a proto-Renaissance artist. He helped pioneer the movement toward realism that would

Nicola Pisano, Madonna and Child, Scrovegni Chapel. Padua, Italy

mark the Renaissance. The influences upon him came from both the North, with the new naturalness of Gothic sculpture done in France, and from the south, where the Byzantine influence was still heavily felt. He managed to meld them together creating something new and compelling. Nicola Pisano’s sculptures were known to Giotto, and he attempted to accomplish what Pisano had achieved in sculpture with paint.

(An interesting side note, one of the three sculptures on the altar of the chapel is a Madonna sculpted by Nicola Pisano. The Madonna’s classical style is similar to Giotto’s frescoes and was created at the same time. The statue sits on the high altar of the chapel.)

The move to realism in sculpture began 100 years before realism in paintings. It is far easier to create realistic sculptures than realistic paintings. To achieve a true three dimensional effect in paint on a flat surface one must be adept at understanding and using perspective, foreshortening, and shading. Certainly, these were used in the past, and in a limited way in Byzantine art, but those artist had not been looking to communicate in the same way Giotto was.

For 1,000 years painters had been using the medium of paint to visually write stories. Yes, they were often beautiful, mystical even, but they were meant to communicate and teach the Biblical narrative and to direct believers hearts to God.  With a great deal of the population illiterate, churches wrote with pictures and frescoes the great truths of the Bible. Artists were also constrained by the fear that graven images would lead believers into worshiping false gods, and so restraint was used, painting in stylized ways that avoided too much realism.

The leap that Giotto made might be more understandable if you have a clear picture of how artists worked during the middle ages and why painting had remained largely unchanged for hundreds of years. Artists were skilled craftsmen. Apprenticed as a teen boy to a master, you would start out sweeping and fetching, move up to prepping panels and walls, and eventually learn to draw and paint….from patterns. All artists worked from pattern books and aspiring artists spent hours working to learn to reproduce the patterns. When a painting was commissioned, patterns from the book would be arranged within the prescribed space or frame and made to fit and tell the story.

Of course, some artists might become interested in something and add an original drawing, but this was the exception rather than the rule. Each master had a workshop and when he took on a large commission, those who worked for him would paint the portions he delegated to them. It is very difficult to determine which portions of a painting are actually the master’s brushstrokes, and which are artists working under him, because they all worked from the same patterns. While painting the Arena Chapel Giotto had 40 men working with him.

So throw out your idea of an artist sitting with his sketchbook on the beach sketching the ocean. That process came later. In this era, artists did not draw what they saw, the drew what they had been taught to reproduce. Some were very skilled at it, but it was a learned craft, and approached differently than how we typically envision the artist working.

Giotto. Nativity Scene. Scrovegni Chapel/Arena Chapel. Padua, Italy

Giotto wanted more, he didn’t want to use his paintings just to give the viewer information, he wanted to transport them, so that they felt they were standing there as the sacred stories played out. He imagined expressions, gestures, movements. He put himself in the role of Joseph, how would he walk, what would he look at? He noticed and attempted to reproduce a more real world. He had been trained in the same way as artists had for centuries, he was inspired by the new sculpture he was seeing, but didn’t possess the training to transfer that to painting, he was stepping out beyond what he knew. To our modern eye he hasn’t achieved realism, but in his time…he had begun a revolution.

Given that Giotto was influenced by Gothic sculpting,and was looking to those sculptures as models, it is not surprising that his figures have a sculpted solidity.  Look at Joseph, he is a solid triangular form, with the draping cloak, he looks sculpted.

Detail from Giotto’s nativity painted for the Arena Chapel.

The striking element of this painting to me is the facial expressions of the holy family. Mary and Jesus are gazing at one another. This is not the Byzantine model where Mary is looking out at the viewer. This is a mother eyeing her baby with wonder. Jesus gazes back with intensity, and to my eye, an adult expression.

When cropping this detail I noticed that the halo around Jesus differs than the one behind Mary, Joseph, or the angels. His head is framed by a cross. Symbols foreshadowing Christ death are frequently in Nativity scenes. It’s an interesting detail.

You will note, that Giotto is still using hieratic scale. As Mary is reclining, it is not quite as noticeable, but she is much larger than the other figures in the painting. This is because she is more important. Size denoted importance, not reality.

In later Renaissance works we will feel as though we are drawn into the painting, into a real room or forest. There isn’t room for us in the foreground of this painting. This is more like viewing a play. There is real depth to the figures, but it is like the set on a stage. The figures are compressed into a shallow architectural space, much as they would be on a stage. Like a stage setting, the chairs are real, there are physical overhangs for roofs, but it is different than achieving the feeling of actually walking into a house. That degree of realism is still to come.

As I mentioned, these paintings were all frescoes. Fresco means ‘fresh’. The area to be painted in a day was prepped with a thin layer of plaster, and while it was still wet, the artist painted with water colors on it. The pigments soaked into the plaster, and as it dried the paint became part of the wall. The paint did not just sit on the surface. If one were to scratch a fresco the color would remain true, as it had gone into the wall.

This presented challenges. The artist had to pre-determine how much he thought he could finish in a day. If he didn’t get as far as he’d planned, the unused plaster would have to be chipped away so that a new layer could be applied without creating an uneven surface. This also created issues with paint colors not matching exactly. It is often possible to see where each days work began. “Giornata” is the word for these areas, and came to mean “a day’s work”.

The blue areas you see in the painting had to be painted in secco. This means on a dry area. There were several reasons for this. The ultramarine pigment was very expensive, and when painting on wet plaster, more pigment is needed. Thus, to save money artist waited until the plaster and first layers of paint dried. The pigment also contained azurite, which can turn green on contact with water. And lastly the blue was more vibrant when applied on the dry surface. For these reasons Giotto painted the blue portions a secco.

Giotto, The Triumphal Entry. Scrovegni Chapel, Padua, Italy

Viewers today can observe whole areas where the blue paint is ‘fugitive’ or has disappeared over time. Mary’s cloak used to be a rich dark blue, but the paint has faded in spots, and whole portions of the background have disappeared. When we consider the work was done 700 years ago, it seems to be in very good shape. I’ve included a picture of Christ arriving in Jerusalem, his robe has completely lost the rich blue color that originally had been painted on.

If you have a chance, I’d suggest watching this video, which will give you a better feel of the Chapel.

 

For other articles in this series follow this link. 

 

Sources

E.H. Gombrich, The Story of Art. (New York, Phaidon Press, 2016)

Professor Sharon Latchaw Hirsh, How to Look at and Understand Great Art, Lecture series, Great Courses

Professor William Koss, History of European Art  Lecture series, Great Courses

Sister Wendy Beckett, The Story of Painting (London, Dorsey Kindersley, 2000)

Marilyn Stokstad, Art History. (New Jersey, Pearson Education, 2005)

National Gallery of Art website  www.nga.gov

Metropolitan Museum of Art website  www.metmuseum.org

The Getty Center www.getty.edu

And thanks to the Met and Wiki commons quality images for public domain art is now much more easily accessible.

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.